માનનીય મોદીજી સાદા કેસ ને ગૂંચવાડા કેસ માં તબદીલ કેવી રીતે કરવો તેનું ઉત્તમ ઉદાહરણ એટલે શ્રી ર.મ.શાહ dated ૫/૬/૮૯ ના રોજ postaldepartment માં ઓર્ડર આવ્યો તે ઓર્ડર મુજબ ધર્મજ મુકામે હાજર થયો ત્યાર પછી મારી ૩૦વર્ષ ની નૌકરી માં નડિયાદ ખેડા સિંહુજ મહેમદાવાદ ( ૩)વખત બદલી ભરી તે દરમિયાન દર વર્ષે ઓડિટ શ્રી sspos ખેડા ડિવિઝન દ્વારા કરવામાં આવેસાલ ૧૯૧૫ સુઘી બધું બરાબર ચાલ્યુ સાલ ૧૯૧૫ માં sspos શ્રી ર.મ.શાહ આવ્યા અને તેમણે postmaster અને મારી પાસે રૂપિયા ની માગણી કરી હતી પરંતુ કોઈ ખોટું કામ (૨page)

1) Have privacy shield & safeguards against unlawful data storage/ transfer/processing without notification by cloud service provider. 2) Develop interoperability standard for data reuse. 3) Store data for limited period use except for scientific research upon consent. 4) Ensure fairness in allocation of value from data among actors in data economy. 5) Data controllers should not only apply principles in law but also they should be able to prove accountability with proofs & respect above principles. 6) For children below 20, parents consent is must. 7) Right to access or change or delete/ erase or rectification own personal data in any platform/ e-commerce should be fundamental right. 8) Consent is not needed in circumstances where exchange of info is vital for patient who are unable to provide. 9) Ensure establishment of remote ways to access own personal data. 10) Have right to data portability/ transfer your data from one data controller to other with a copy upon demand by owner.

1) Where the transfer involves personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical views, trade union membership, genetic data, biometric data for identity of natural person, health data, persons sex life or sexual orientation, data of criminal conviction or civil or family or offences , social media derogatory remarks, the data importer & exporter must ensure specific restrictions with additional safeguards like pseudonymisation). 2) Onward data transfer to be prohibited without explicit consent & approval from Govt for outside India. 3) Data importer/exporter to keep appropriate documentation for collecting, processing,transmitting,storing required by law. 4) For breach of any data, data importer/processor/exporter must notify on no time to user and competent authority with measures taken and point of contact. 5) Data importer/processor/exporter should not keep data for infinite period & should not sale or lease or transfer beyond purpose.

1) Ensure e2e legal accountability & independent regulatory oversight including privacy. 2) Transparency in adopting languages of open data. 3) Prescribe legislative standards for data collection, data sharing interstate& cross country , data processing, data transmission, data automated tools, consent in varied situations, data use by state/central/other country/marketing/court/hospitals etc. 4) Licensing of citizen data with consent, purpose & time limit. 5) Don’t make data open by default. 6) Adequate provisions for privacy preservation (anonymous is not useful). 7) Fines for non-compliance should be 5% of annual revenue worldwide or $50 million whichever is higher to org who misuse with jail term of 30 years. 8) Put restrictions on transfers of personal data from Indian Union without adequate protection & stop to countries which do not have data protection/privacy law. 9) Have standard contractual clauses for companies. 10) Importer & Exporter of data should be in legal framework.

आज के सर टेक्नोलॉजी के जमाने में डाटा प्राइवेसी एक बहुत ही महत्वपूर्ण कार्य है हमें डाटा को किस प्रकार उसकी प्राइवेसी करनी है ताकि कम से कम हमारे समाज में साइबरक्राइम हो और लोगों को इसके प्रति अवेयर करना ताकि साइबर क्राइम होने से बचाया जा सके और हम एक ऐसे आधुनिक टेक्नोलॉजी की ओर जा रहे हैं जिससे हमारी भावी पीढ़ी को अवगत कराना बहुत ही जरूरी है अगर यह टेक्नोलॉजी का जमाना है तो इससे हमें जितने लाभ होते हैं उससे कहीं ज्यादा हानियां भी हो सकती हैं अगर हम इसका प्रॉपर यूज नहीं करते हैं इसलिए डाटा प्राइ

the policy will organised to all the people.

Data accessibility & policy needs to be robust. We are fully dependent for electronic networking. We have seen what has happened in Russia & Ukraine.We are moving to a cashless economy. In case of wars how prepared are we. In electronic age warfare is disturbing the network to paralyze the economy. We are highly populated cash problems could be enormous.Most of the transactions happen on internet or mobile banking. We may have Rupay or Bhim but connectivity will be an issue if our towers or Servers are attacked.We load information on cloud I don't know whether the cloud server is within India or outside.How are we sure we will have connectivity if the serveroperation falls in a hostile country. If one area is attacked whether systems are in place to isolate that area instead of loosing the entire grid of network. From TV network can we have internet access in individual houses or offices through satellite. Can the systems be upgraded for these systems. Its my view not knowing much.

3. Perverse Revenue Objective: The second issue is that the policy bypasses parliament as it contemplates large scale data sharing and enrichment that will be borne from public funds. 4. Federalism: The policy, even though it notes that State governments will be, “free to adopt portions of the policy,” does not specify how such freedom will be achieved. It becomes relevant, if specific standards are prescribed by the Central government for data sharing, or as a precondition to financial assistance. 5. Lack of Clarity on Definitions for Key Concepts: New concepts introduced by the Policy have been defined in a vague and ambiguous manner which opens them up to misinterpretation. The Policy creates a separate category of ‘High-Value Datasets’ which it deems essential for governance and innovation, access to which will be accelerated. However, nowhere in the Background Note or the Policy has the category been concisely defined.

2. Transparency: While adopting the language of open data it strays from its core principle of providing transparency of the Government towards its citizens. There is only one mention of transparency and little to no mention of how such data sharing will help ensure demands for accountability and redress.

The commercial value of the data increases with greater amounts of personal data. The absence of an anchoring legislation further leads to the policy not being able to fulfil the threshold of legality for state intervention into privacy which was put in place by the Supreme Court of India in its landmark right to privacy decision (K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India 2017)